Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
twins-planner
twins-planner
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 4
    • Issues 4
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • bigprint
  • twins-plannertwins-planner
  • Issues
  • #58

Closed
Open
Opened Jan 13, 2021 by Jayant Khatkar@13765728Owner3 of 4 tasks completed3/4 tasks

Align planning parameters with true hardware

Some of the planning parameters used do not match the real hardware. This issue is to link to any of those types of changes.

  • #57 (closed)
  • Slicer config
  • Orientation at approach should be different for each arm - depending on the arm's orientation
  • List others as noticed below
Edited Jan 28, 2021 by Jayant Khatkar
Assignee
Assign to
3D planning env setup and Greedy Scheduling
Milestone
3D planning env setup and Greedy Scheduling (Past due)
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: bigprint/twins-planner#58